equanto que em são bento...
no estado americano do connecticut o supremo tribunal considerou que a legislação de uniões de facto para casais de pessoas do mesmo sexo era inconstitucional. será que teremos um dia o nosso tc a pronunciar-se assim assumindo-se a ruptura com a lógica salazarista de isolacionismo?
We conclude that, in light of the history of pernicious discrimination faced by gay men and lesbians, and because the institution of marriage carries it it a status and significance that the newly crated classification of civil unions does not embody, the segregation of heterosexual and homosexual couples into separate institutions constitutes a cognizable harm. We also conclude that our state scheme discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation, for the same reasons that classifications predicated on gender are considered quasi-suspect for the purposes of the equal protection provisions of the United States constitutions…
…
The state has failed to provide sufficient justification for excluding same sex couples from the institution of marriage.
…
The state has failed to provide sufficient justification for excluding same sex couples from the institution of marriage.
0 Comments:
Enviar um comentário
<< Home